Tag Archives: frustrated employees

The science of employee engagement

We’ve all heard that joke about the CEO who was asked how many people worked in his organization. “Oh, about half of them,” he replied. But jokes apart, measuring how engaged your staff really is with your organization, could make for frightening reading today. Recent research conducted by Hay Group has found that just about two-thirds of employees worldwide are engaged at the workplace. Further, our study found that an average of 33 per cent of employees are unable to perform optimally, admitting that barriers put in place by the organization are preventing them from excelling at work. These are startling figures indeed.

On the brighter side, all of our research shows that employees want to work and they want to work hard; it is what human beings naturally want to do. Given that the vast majority of us want to work, what then is the driving force behind those who want to work in the same direction as the employer and those that don’t?

The science of measuring and following up on employee engagement (the measure of enthusiasm and alignment to organizational goals) has come a long way in the past three decades. Years of global research with many millions of employees of all levels and demographic groups has given Hay Group a pretty definitive understanding of what really drives people to come to work and to work effectively.  A well aligned workforce results in better bottom-line performance. It delivers higher scores on pretty much any business critical key performance indicators you care to mention, whether they be profit, innovation, safety or anything else. It also means comparatively better share performance.

Clearly, these days, more than ever, employee engagement must be part of any company’s key performance indicators and should be tied into decisions that affect return on investment.

What is worrying then, is that at a time when global companies are looking to deliver increasingly better performance, we are seeing employee engagement across the world decline or stagnate at 2008 levels. Our study on Engagement, that spanned 1610 organizations across 46 countries, represents the views of almost five million employees – and a great number amongst them are unwilling and unable to go the extra mile for their organization. With global engagement scores pegged at 66 per cent, we have found that employers in India are only marginally better off with 68 per cent of engaged employees.

This unique study also showed that employees across the globe are not properly supported at work – and are unable to perform to their full potential as a result. Less than two thirds of employees around the world (62 per cent) feel that conditions at work allow them to be as productive as they could be. Clearly, there is a stubborn gap between the level of discretionary effort that employees globally are willing to put into their work and the corresponding level of support available to enable them to excel. For organizations looking to harness the full productivity of their workforce, leaving this pool of motivation untapped is a wasted opportunity. Employees based in India are slightly better off in terms of employee enablement; however, more than a quarter admit that they could be more effective, if workplace conditions allow for greater productivity.

Our experience shows that to truly drive productivity, business leaders must understand the role they have to play in enabling high levels of performance – removing the barriers that are holding their employees and their organizations back. This ability of engaged individuals to make maximum contributions has two key components. The first, personal utilization, requires that employees are effectively matched to their roles, such that their skills and abilities are put to best use. The second component, an enabling environment, involves structuring work arrangements such that they facilitate, rather than hinder, individual productivity.

Even so, company loyalty is another metric that has taken a hit in these tough times, with commitment levels falling to a five-year low in every major region. More than two-fifths (44 per cent) of the global workforce has expressed their intent to leave their present employers within five years, with more than one in five employees (21 per cent) amongst these intending to leave within two years! A much larger majority of employees in India (58 per cent) have acknowledged their intent to exit their present organizations within the next years, with about one in every three planning this shift within two years. It is a worrying sign that Indian organizations, despite averaging higher engagement levels than the Asia average, find that only about 40 per cent intend to remain loyal to their present organizations in the next five years. Frustrated employees are unlikely to persist over the long-term in this state. Clearly, the opportunities currently available for organizations to improve the bottom line by actively engaging the workforce have never been so good – and the time to act is now.

More than ever, the benefits of real engagement are being recognized. Even minor improvements in employee engagement see measurable, often significant, improvements in business outcomes. In turbulent times, a highly engaged workforce dramatically improves the chance of weathering the storm – it is a real differentiator between winners and losers at such times.

The share performance curve of organizations with highly engaged employees is generally smoother and generally moves in an upward direction, compared to that of organizations with poor engagement levels, our research shows. In other words, market forces have less of an effect on high engagement environments. Investors are increasingly seeing the link between engagement and business outcomes. Engagement is a great predictor of future financial performance. In fact, our work on The Enemy of Engagement found that organizations in the top quartile on employee engagement demonstrate revenue growth 2.5 times that of those in the bottom quartile; even as companies in the top quartile on both engagement and enablement achieve revenue growth 4.5 times greater.

Despite the numbers, getting engaged performance is not just about investing financially in employees through perks or pay hikes. It is about striking a new contract in which the organization invests emotionally in its workforce. In exchange, employees make a similar emotional investment, pouring their “discretionary effort” into their work and delivering superior performance. The new contract says, “We’ll make your job (and life) more meaningful. You give us your hearts and minds.”

Engagement (and enablement) is about motivating employees to perform at their best by providing necessary resources and support. Managers must combine engagement (the use of motivational tools), with enablement (the act of providing employees with effective resources), in order to reach optimal levels of employee satisfaction and productivity. They must listen carefully to their teams for common frustration themes, and address them by prioritizing goals, advocating for resources and minimizing workflow disruptions. They must provide adequate training, support, and discretion to grow—and not hold employees back with excessive procedures, decision processes, lack of resources and overly narrow roles. Evidently, the need of the hour is for organizations and managers to create sustainable long-term strategies to better enable their employees; in effect equipping them for the organization’s success.

Read more about keeping your workforce switched on in our Employee Engagement e-report,

Employee frustration: The bane of workplace productivity

Workplace frustration is a silent epidemic creeping through organizations, yet it is rarely confronted or even recognized. Frustration wears down motivated, dedicated employees who really care about their jobs but can’t get the organizational support they need to get things done. Focused on making contributions, these employees often hide their frustration, leaving managers in the dark about their discontent.

Just as the epic Batman movie finds the masked superhero struggling to hold his own against Bane, his sinister nemesis; there is a silent bane to productivity lurking in our workplaces – frustration. While many organizations proclaim that people are their most important asset, a good many fail to act as though they really believe it.  But that doesn’t make it any less true that talented and engaged employees can provide the most sustainable source of differentiation; a competitive advantage that competitors simply cannot replicate.

Though frameworks for understanding employee engagement vary, it commonly looks to capture levels of commitment and discretionary effort demonstrated by employees. Simply put, engaged employees are more likely to be willing to go above and beyond formal job requirements (the ‘discretionary’ effort), make for better organizational citizens, and devote greater effort and ownership towards their work.

Despite the plain stating, this remains a challenging issue for organizations to address. In a climate where they are straining to do more with less, organizations cannot afford to squander the energy of engaged and motivated employees. Tapping into the discretionary effort of engaged employees has become all the more imperative given today’s business outlook. The ever-increasing pace of change in modern organizations calls for employees at all levels to be able to face unanticipated and ambiguous business conditions. In this case, organizations that are able to get engagement right can count on their employees to act in ways that are consistent with the organizational objectives, given the employees’ alignment with organizational values and standards. Finally, the relevance of engagement comes from employees themselves, who today are in charge of their own work paths and the definition of career success. More and more employees are looking for environments where they can be engaged and contribute to the larger picture.

Here is the catch. Many companies enjoy high levels of engagement, yet still struggle in terms of performance.  Unfortunately, high employee engagement alone does not guarantee an organization’s effectiveness. You also need real employee enablement – developing systems that provide for better support for the success of employees. Hay Group’s research suggests that frustrated employees represent a significant lost opportunity for organizations – individuals who are aligned with corporate goals and energized about making a difference, yet are held back by roles that do not fully leverage their skills, or by work environments that are not supportive or create barriers in the way of accomplishing their work.

From a motivational perspective, leaders have these employees right where they want them. But when it comes to allowing them to be as productive as they can be, leaders are missing out. The truth is, frustrated employees are unlikely to persist over the long-term in this state, no matter how motivated they are. Engaged employees need to have the confidence that the organization is doing all it can to promote their success, rather than having to worry about obstacles in the form of non-essential tasks or procedural red tape.

An ‘enabled’ work environment essentially points to two do’s. The first, optimized roles, allows employees to be effectively aligned to their job roles, such that their skills and abilities are being put to good use. The second relates to a supportive environment, where work arrangements are structured in a way to facilitate, rather than hinder, individual productivity. For true enablement, employees must have all essential resources at hand that are required to get a job done – information, technology, tools and equipment, and financial resources.

Effectiveness, when implied as a result of ‘engagement’ and ‘enablement’, has proven to impact the bottom line. Our research with hundreds of companies shows that organizations in the top quartile on engagement exhibit revenue growth 2.5 times more than those in the bottom quartile; but the companies in the top quartile on both engagement and enablement achieve revenue growth 4.5 times greater! Companies with high engagement levels also demonstrate 40 per cent lower turnover rates than those with low engagement; but those that both engage and enable employees display a 54 per cent reduction in voluntary turnover rates. Clearly, this shows just how central employee engagement can be to an organization’s success when combined with appropriate levels of employee enablement.

How can your organization listen for signs of employee frustration? You can ensure you are doing the best possible job of enabling your employees with the following in mind:

  1. Managers must combine engagement (the use of motivational tools), with enablement (the act of providing employees with effective resources), in order to reach optimal levels of employee satisfaction and productivity.
  2. Managers must listen carefully to their teams for common frustration themes, and address them by prioritizing goals, advocating for resources and minimizing workflow disruptions.
  3. Organizations with supportive environments limit the extent to which work tasks ‘crowd out’ personal time by permitting employees to complete the most vital tasks as efficiently as possible. Employees are likely to feel better about staying late or coming in early if they are working on tasks with a clear purpose and are given the authority necessary to make decisions about how best to accomplish their objectives.
  4. Instead of waiting for the annual review to discuss performance, managers should create a culture of dialogue about goals, priorities and challenges throughout the year.
  5. Organizations must provide adequate training, support, and discretion to grow—and not hold employees back with excessive procedures, decision processes, lack of resources and overly narrow roles.
  6. Conflict between the operational goals of different departments often diminishes cooperation. To fix this, interdepartmental communication must be strengthened by sharing both people and information.
  7. Managers need to identify where individual goals are competing with shared goals and must work to eliminate, or at least minimize these obstacles.

Read more about keeping your workforce switched on in our Employee Engagement e-report,

Engagement alone is passé. Think ‘Engagement + Enablement’

You want to develop an effective workforce. But at the same time, you believe that engagement is enough to keep your employees involved. Time to introspect, we say.

Jupiter_c90a489b-LOW-22639206

Every company wants to create an engaged workforce. But how many of them are consciously working to both engage and enable their employees?

In every organization, there are a few select people, who are completely committed to their work and their organization. These are those members of the workforce, who go the extra mile, above and beyond their roles. Not only do they produce work of superior quality, but they also demonstrate the potential to be the leaders of tomorrow. The key word here is ‘potential’. It is therefore, no surprise that organizations too want to leave no stone unturned, in their effort to retain this valuable talent. So what do most companies do to hold on to their high performers? Let’s see. I am sure you can think of the usual employee engagement methods. Surveys, training programs- you know. The works. After all, we all know that our workforce is our greatest asset, right? Wrong.

Organizations may think that they are doing enough by engaging their precious resources. But, here’s a fact. Engagement is not enough. Your efforts to engage your workforce are not enough. This will not keep them from walking out the door.

The ‘frustrated’ employee

Now that we’ve stated some blunt facts, here is an elaboration.  Yes, ‘engaged’ employees are ‘motivated’ employees. But in the wrong environment, these valuable assets can end up as ‘engaged and frustrated’ employees.

Since, these employees are motivated, they do put in the extra effort to ensure they do a good job to match your expectations.  But, here’s what we want you to pay attention to. What if you have a highly motivated employee in a mismatched, unsupportive environment? In this unfavorable situation, it’s only a matter of time, before the negative and harmful feeling of frustration sweeps in.

What do frustrated employees do? Break through, break down or break free?

In The Enemy of Engagement, Mark Royal and Tom Agnew identify three things that could happen with highly engaged, but frustrated employees. Number one- these individuals could break through the barriers in their path and reach their goals, through sheer perseverance. Number two- these high potential employees could break down in the face of the obstacles and simply reduce the amount of effort they put in. Or number three and the most likely of all, they could just break free and move on to greener pastures.

So, what’s the solution?

Here’s what we suggest. Identify the ‘missing link’ and do something about it. Engagement is not enough; employees need to be enabled too. To frame it in one phrase, think ‘engagement + enablement’.

Our extensive research displays that organizations are not focusing enough on ‘employee enablement’, which essentially involves creating an environment conducive for getting things done. Enablement could take on various forms, such as supporting employees in reaching their goals, removing needless barriers to productivity and ensuring that the right people are doing the right jobs.

The best recipe for success in the workplace is a combination of engagement and enablement. Engagement can help create feelings of motivation and commitment to the organization, and enablement will help sustain this.

Take the case of an online money lending firm, which was undergoing a massive strategy and brand change, during the time it decided to have an employee effectiveness survey done. The survey ensured that all the employees’ concerns about the changes were sufficiently addressed, by linking the effectiveness parameters to the key performance indicators of the business. The result? The survey confirmed that 49% of the employees expressed a desire to work for the company for more than 2 years, as opposed to only 27% of them just six months ago.

So, here’s what every organization can do to retain its talent. Study various parameters, such as performance management, employee empowerment, the availability of resources and training opportunities, the degree of collaboration present, and structure and process of the work. Only through an elaborate process like this one, will you be able to identify the barriers to employee effectiveness. And as we all already know, step one of solving any problem, is to acknowledge that you have an issue at hand, which needs to be fixed. Our first piece of advice- take the crucial first step.

Read more about keeping your workforce switched on in our Employee Engagement e-report,